Op-Ed: Assemblywoman Calls for Action Against Flooding
District 38 Assemblywoman Connie Wagner says putting off the problem will make it more costly.
In 1958, my mother and father started their journey towards achieving the American Dream, building their own home, in what were once the idyllic country-like surroundings of South Hackensack, New Jersey with weeping willow trees, open space filled with fields and plenty of ponds to go ice skating on in the winter.
Each weekend, Dad and the rest of the family would gather with hammer and nails and work for hours alongside the hired carpenter. The result was a three bedroom Cape Cod house which was our castle; the collective effort of working hard, saving and sacrificing for our family’s dream.
As the years went by development after development popped up along the landscape: factories, homes and paved parking lots. The surroundings may have changed but to our family it was still our home. However, with each passing storm, water began inundating our basement. So after experiencing one too many rainstorms Dad purchased and installed a sump pump, but it was not enough to keep the water from entering our basement.
One of the final memories I have of my father after he suffered a stroke was him sitting in a chair holding a wet-vac waging an unwinnable battle with the surging water. His castle was being destroyed.
This past fall as I visited the communities of Rochelle Park, Saddle Brook, New Milford and Lodi and spoke with residents, I understood their pain. I listened to the residents who told me of their endless battles with flooding. The residents begged me to not forget them and to do something.
“Out of sight, out of mind” they would say. Their fear was that after the storm, nothing would be done and I am afraid that they are right. They wanted government to work for them, to help ease their pain, to lessen the effects of the damaging rain storms. The “once-in-a-lifetime” storm for some had occurred five times. Losing their home was not only financially costly but also emotionally costly. Their castles were destroyed.
I hear the comments, “New Jersey has no money”, “There is no emergency”, and “The people have to vote.” Did the people vote on the $261 million tax break for the Revel project in Atlantic City? Did the people vote on the $102.4 million tax break for Panasonic? Did we vote on the $82 million tax break for Goya to stay in New Jersey?
Must we wait for another storm before we do the simple projects to try to alleviate some of the damage? Putting off action will only result in recurring damage to our communities. We are all paying for it one way or another by the heavy costs of clean up and rebuilding.
This recurring nightmare requires the fortitude to take the first steps to try and tackle the problem. By repairing some of our transportation and water infrastructure we might be able to partially mitigate the disastrous effects these floods have taken on our families, friends and neighbors.
Government must step up and remedy the situation, and yes, we will have to pay, but if we put off the problem, the solution will only become more costly.
Connie Wagner, Paramus, District 38 Assemblywoman
Keith Jensen
6:34 pm on Saturday, December 10, 2011
Assemblywoman Wagner,
Flooding is an issue, thank you for recognizing it, but it is not the biggest issue. Since it is obvious you are reading this, why can't you find a way to stick up for those in District and speak out against the Abbott Ruling? This costs $12M a yr to RiverDell alone, approx. a 35% prop. tax hike.
For ex., parents with a 3, 4 or 5 year old child get free Pre-K education in the 31 Abbott School Districts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abbott_district
Neither RiverDell, nor any other town you represent is an Abbott District. Yet, parents no matter what their financial status is, must pay for their Pre-K education.
However, just by virtue of living in Hoboken, which is an Abbott School District, the child receives FREE Pre-K education; incidentally the value of this Pre-K education is more than $20K a year, and the parents of RiverDell end up paying for the children of Hoboken. That includes the parents who make any sum of money in Hoboken receive free Pre-K Ed, simply because they live in Hoboken.
In RiverDell, nearly 60% of local taxes go to education, but approximately 20% of it stays in town. The rest is sent to Trenton and distributed to 31 Abbott School Districts: towns with a greater need than RiverDell, towns such as Hoboken.
Flooding is an issue, but it pales in comparison of the abused Abbott School ruling and how you do not speak out against it, or at least adjust it so it is fair to those you represent.www.schoolfundingexposed.com
Keith Jensen
7:04 pm on Saturday, December 10, 2011
For Hasbrouck Heights,The added tax is nearly $12M annually due to the Assemblywoman and peers not representing Hasbrouck Heights. Rather, she votes in favor of the wonton spending of your tax dollars in the 31 Districts where Hasbrouck Heights taxes are sent to subsidize.
This means by your state representatives in District 38, not taking a position against Abbott, EVERY SINGLE municipality is paying nearly 35% more in property taxes.
In fact, every town in Bergen County is paying for this fleecing, less Garfield. Because Garfield is an Abbott District.
This is how it works in Garfield. There is a PreK teacher pressed to throw away the classroom furniture every year, just to justify the need to buy new furniture the following year, and that furniture is paid by Glen Rock's excessive property taxes, and Hasbrouck Heights, and every one of the other 68 towns in Bergen County; notwithstanding, 85% of the state that is not an Abbott District.
Here is a little more info on how it works, documented by PATCH:
http://fortlee.patch.com/articles/fort-lee-republican-state-assembly-candidate-pushes-for-fair-school-funding
Hopefully Sen Gordon, Assemblywoman Wagner and all public officials and groups will sign the attached resolution, thus proving they too are fighting for their constituents.
Ricky
5:03 am on Sunday, December 11, 2011
"""development after development popped up along the landscape: factories, homes and paved parking lots."""
That's what it's all about. There really isn't a practical financial solution to solve the flood issues of ALL residents and businesses in the state, let alone all affected in Bergen County. Government must step up you say but you are in the state government so what is your proposal for solution to this issue?